While there might be a debate on
whether marriage is a civil contract or a sacrament or something in between,
under the present legal scenario, marriage is a form of legalised sexual
relationship that establishes paternity and inheritance. In certain tribes, living
together constitutes a valid marriage and for every region there is a different
set of formalities constituting marriage, some may have pheras while for others
just exchanging rings or garlands is sufficient. In short, the ceremony of
marriage is just the recognition by society of the beginning of a relationship
and it may or may not constitute of ceremonies. While the Supreme Court has
laid down what constitutes a valid Hindu marriage, Muslim marriage is offer and
acceptance and Christian marriage, a public declaration along with exchange of
rings. A civil marriage is also a consensual acceptance of the relationship in
a court of law. The importance of sex in marriage has already been pointed out
in 2012 by the Supreme Court while stating that it is the primary condition. However,
the recent judgement of Madras High Court stating that consensual sex between
competent parties (parties who have come of legal age for sex) is equivalent to
marriage and either party can get it registered is not altogether a solution. While
on one hand it raises a doubtful condition regarding adultery, bigamy, incest and prostitution, on the other, it will incite moral police. Further, it is not sure what
documentary evidence can be provided for such relationship. The judgement cannot be said to be compatible with the social realities. Still, it raises an
important issue especially at the time when brides were subjected to virginity
and pregnancy tests in the state of Madhya Pradesh, even though premarital sex
is not taboo in certain tribes of that region.
No comments:
Post a Comment