Food is the most essential
requirement for life and the level of nutrition determines the standard of
generations of citizens. In a country like India, where the majority of its
citizens live below the poverty line and a third of them are malnourished
resulting in high infant and mother mortality, ensuring food security should be
the imminent duty of the government.
Article 47 of the Indian
Constitution provides the duty of the State to raise the level of nutrition and
the standard of living and to improve public health. It states: The State shall
regard the raising of the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its
people and the improvement of public health as among its primary duties and, in
particular, the State shall endeavour to bring about prohibition of the
consumption except for medicinal purposes of intoxicating drinks and of drugs
which are injurious to health.
Proposed food security law
The proposed food security bill
aims at providing 35 kgs of food grains to priority families and 20 kgs to other
households at a price not exceeding the fifty percent of the minimum support
prices for grains (rice, wheat and millets). It aims at providing to the
priority households rice at the rate of Rs 3/kg and wheat at Rs 2/kg, pulses at
Rs 20/kg and oils at Rs 35/kg.
Shortcomings
The proposed bill does not ensure
sufficient nutrients as the amount fixed does not qualify to satisfy the
nutritional requirements of an average family of five. Further, the
requirements of fats, vitamins, proteins are not adequately covered.
Another drawback comes in the
implementation of the scheme. Corruption and failed public distribution system
are evident of the fact that the intended beneficiaries may not be able to
benefit from it.
Providing food security further
requires that the production is also secured. Before, implementing the scheme,
it is essential to see that agriculture is ensured. With droughts and floods
damaging the crops, the government has to take a positive step in ensuring that
it has the food grains needed for distribution. A second green revolution may
be required but this time with the use of organic fertilisers and avoiding
chemical pesticides and fertilisers.
No comments:
Post a Comment