Wednesday 27 February 2013

Trade Unions


Section 2(h) of the Trade Unions Act, 1926, defines trade unions as: any combination, whether temporary or permanent, formed primarily for the purpose of regulating the relations between workmen and employers or between workmen and workmen, or between employers and employers, or for imposing restrictive conditions on the conduct of any trade or business, and includes any federation of two or more Trade Unions.

Registration of trade unions:

Any 7 or more members of a trade union may apply for its registration by sending an application to the Registrar containing details as per the names, occupation and addresses of persons applying, name of the trade union and address of its registered office and details of the office bearers along with a general statement of assets and liabilities[1]. The registrar will register the trade union if he is satisfied that it fulfils all the requirements of the Act[2] and issue a certificate of registration in a prescribed form[3].

Rights and liabilities of a registered trade union

Rights

(1)    Constitution of a separate fund for political purposes- section 16

(2)    Immunity from liability in criminal conspiracy- section 17

(3)    Immunity from civil suits in certain cases- section 18

(4)    Agreements between members in restraint of trade not void or voidable- section 19

(5)    Right to inspect books- section 20

(6)    Right of minors above 15 years of age to membership- section 21

Liabilities

(1)    General funds to be spent only for specific purposes- section 15

(2)    Disqualification of office bearers- section 21-A



[1] Section 5
[2] Section 8
[3] Section 9

Tuesday 5 February 2013

Juvenile delinquency

Blackstone stated that: ‘infancy is a defect of understanding, and infants under the age of discretion ought not to be punished by any criminal prosecution whatsoever.’
The Indian Penal Code, 1860, provides that infants under the age of 7 years are completely exempted from all criminal liability[1] while those between the ages of 7 and 12 are exempted only if they have not attained sufficient maturity of understanding the nature and consequences of their act[2]. Under the provisions of IPC, if a child above the age of 7 years and below 10 years shows sufficient maturity so as to know the nature and consequences of his actions, he is not granted complete immunity.
However, the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000[3], has increased the age of juvenility to 18 years and it prohibits death sentence or life imprisonment for juveniles for the commission of any offence under the IPC[4]. But a proviso to Section 16(1) states that: Provided that where a juvenile who has attained the age of sixteen years has committed an offence and the Board is satisfied that the offence committed is of so serious in nature or that his conduct and behaviour have been such that it would not be in hi interest or in the interest of other juvenile in a special home to send him to such special home and that none of the other measures provided under this Act is suitable or sufficient, the Board may order the juvenile in conflict with law to be kept in such place of safety and in such manner as it thinks fit and shall report the case for the order of the State Government.
While the Indian Penal Code is a general law and Juvenile Justice Act is a special law and thus supersedes the provisions of the IPC, in cases of grave and heinous crimes like cold blooded murders or sexual offences, a juvenile should not be given the protection of the special law. When the nature of crime and the manner of commission itself indicates the level of maturity, the relaxation based on chronological age should not be granted.


[1] Section 82
[2] Section 83
[3] Enacted following the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of Child to protect and safeguard the interests of children. While the earlier Act of 1986 had kept the age of males at 16 and of females at 18 to be called child, the Act of 2000 has kept an uniform age of 18 years for both.
[4] Section 16(1)

Monday 4 February 2013

Rights of minorities- cultural and educational rights


The term ‘minority’ generally means a non dominant group. In a relative speech, it means the smaller of the two groups. Minorities include religious minorities, linguistic minorities, political minorities, etc. Backward classes are not minorities. However, any group having its own distinctive language, script, or culture can come under the category of minority and has the right to conserve the same. The Constitution under the provisions of Article 30 recognises the rights of linguistic and religious minorities to establish and administer educational institutions.

Article 29: Protection of interests of minorities

(1) Any section of the citizens residing in the territory of India or any part thereof having a distinct language, script or culture of its own shall have the right to conserve the same

 (2) No citizen shall be denied admission into any educational institution maintained by the State or receiving aid out of State funds on grounds only of religion, race, caste, language or any of them

The essentials of clause (1) of Article 29 is that any group or section of individuals having a distinctive language or script or culture of its own have a right to conserve the same.

Article 29(2) is in consonance with the provisions of Article 15(4). It states that for institutions that are aided or maintained by the State, admission shall not be denied to any citizen of India on the ground of religion, race, caste, language or any of them.

Article 30: Right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions

(1) All minorities, whether based on religion or language, shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice

 (1A) In making any law providing for the compulsory acquisition of any property of an educational institution established and administered by a minority, referred to in clause (1), the State shall ensure that the amount fixed by or determined under such law for the acquisition of such property is such as would not restrict or abrogate the right guaranteed under that clause

 (2) The state shall not, in granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate against any educational institution on the ground that it is under the management of a minority, whether based on religion or language

Article 30 provides the minorities with the right to establish and administer educational institutions; however, the right to administer does not include the right to mal-administer the same. It includes the right to choose its governing body, select teaching and non-teaching staff, set its criteria of admitting students and set its reasonable fee structure and use its funds for the benefit of the institution. However, this right is not absolute and there can be checks on administration and rules may be set out for maintaining the educational standards. Further, religious education is barred in institutions maintained out of State funds.

Thus, while the minorities have a right to establish and administer educational institutions, they have to exercise the right in a reasonable fashion. They cannot mal-administer or create arbitrary rules of administration including rules relating to appointment of staff, admission of students and fee structure. They have to work for the benefit of the institution. The State can formulate rules for the administration of minority institutions but those rules should not take away the autonomy and the administrative rights of the minority community. Further, being aided out of the State funds does not take away the minority status of the educational institution. The purpose of providing this right is to bring the minority community at par with the majority. It is not an absolute right and is subject to restrictions as to the standard of the institute and education be maintained.